I am currently taking a summer course at Georgia State University, Black Nationalism. The class meets from 12noon - 4pm Monday and Wednesday. With a class that long grad students tend to talk and mingle. Well there is a lady in the class, of European decent; I'll call her Shelley, about my same age who also happens to be a mother of teenagers. Consequently, we talk about everything from the assignments for class, the department, our children.
Last week another student in the class mentioned the portrayal of Black men in the media. When the above Vogue cover was mentioned my colleague and I had a vast difference of opinion. Shelley didn't see the problem with first, the large black savage gorilla beast used to lure men into enlisting in the military - to "Destroy this Mad Brute" and save the white women’s virtue; nor did she see the correlation of a 6 foot 8 inch 250lb Black man almost carrying a 5 foot 9inch 120lb woman. They even had her wear a green dress to show the connection with the poster. Does anyone see my point here?
This country has had a long and sordid history of using the media to manipulate the perception of Blacks. Why is this not obvious to anyone who lifts a newspaper/magazine or turns on a television set?
My white liberal colleague came off as too sophisticated not to know about racial injustice and too comfortable with her skin privilege to care. And I am sure I came off as an angry Black militant. I suppose there is no such thing as an objective point of view.
Monday, July 14, 2008
You Decide
Posted by Ms. K.T. at Monday, July 14, 2008
Labels: Advertising, Marketing, Racism
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 Comment:
it's her perspective and probably the perspective of many caucasians. do you think that this colleague of yours has endured any type of racial discrimination in her lifetime? people can discuss racial issues and be "aware" of them all day long but unless it has been or is a part of someone's reality, i wouldn't expect someone to understand why the image of lebron is disturbing or even see the correlation between the two? or perhaps she just doesn't want to admit that she does see the correlation and is subconsciously ashamed that racism so blatantly exists even today on the cover of a highly published magazine because she has "liberal" views. what did she think of the noose on the golf magazine (that were quickly pulled from the stands) when they were writing about tiger?
Post a Comment